Theoferrum

wow the bible is right!

2012-03-18T15:12:27.779-06:00

wow the bible is right!

The Norway Spiral [video=http://www.youtube.com/wa...

2010-07-28T10:45:04.383-06:00

The Norway Spiral
[video=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cGuTU2Gf30]

Here is the info http://theoferrum.activeboard.c...

2010-07-28T10:42:36.591-06:00

Here is the info

http://theoferrum.activeboard.com/forum.spark?aBID=136070&p=3&topicID=37167309

The Norway Spiral occured exactly two days after t...

2010-07-28T10:41:12.464-06:00

The Norway Spiral occured exactly two days after this post.

The New Jerusalem's First Noel since its return...

Apparently, someone somewhere has a problem with s...

2010-06-18T12:30:44.635-06:00

Apparently, someone somewhere has a problem with something I said in this post. This article is reference in this person's blog with a link to my article - which doesn't work which proves my websites are being black listed.

http://kwomblesengl1302.blogspot.com/2009/12/critical-thinking-and-such.html

http://www.big-boards.com/

2010-06-09T15:21:06.986-06:00

http://www.big-boards.com/

Hi Very nice and intrestingss story.

2010-06-04T16:33:33.513-06:00

Hi
Very nice and intrestingss story.

So, here is the deal. Elizebeth had already exper...

2010-06-04T12:53:10.228-06:00

So, here is the deal.

Elizebeth had already experienced menopause and, therefore, there was no specific period of the month that she could get pregnant and since the conception was a miricle from the start then the chances are great that the first time they got together, after he finished serving in the temple, she would have been pregnant. This is only logical considering the excitement (in more ways then one) that they would have been experiencing. Thus, since he served in the second week of the third month then the chances are great that she was pregnant in the third week of the third month from this first choice for a tabernacles birth and this would have John born in the third week of the twelveth month and this requires no reconning for any leap year that may have occured.

This places her sixth month as occuring from the third week of the eighth month to the third week of the ninth month as the time that Y'shua was conceived - Mary's first month of pregnancy.

This places Y'shua's birth anywhere from the third week of the fifth month to the third week of the sixth month and this makes a tabernacles birth completely out of the question. Further, if there was a leap month between, there is no possible way he was born on tabernacles. In fact, the chances are that he would have been born in the fifth month by this theory which is the anniversary of the destruction of the temple twice. Poor symbolism for the birth of the Messiah - just the opposite of what you would expect.

Now, however, if you use the second date then Zecharias served in the 34th week of the year which is the third week of the ninth month meaning Elizebeth was pregnant in the fourth week of the ninth month - Hannakkuh - and John would then have been born the fourth week of the sixth month and Mary's first month of pregnancy would have been from the fourth week of the second month to the fourth week of the third month. Y'shua could have been conceived anytime during that time and the reader will no doubt notice that, in fact, Pentecost - when Israel was married to Y'hova - occurs the very next week and is assuredly when Y'shua was conceived. This would then place his birth, under 'normal' conditions, during the first week (or fourth week if you stick to a strict approach) of the twelveth month or close to Nisan first.

Now, however, Y'shua's birth was not normal. First off, since there was no sin involved either on Y'shua's or on Mary's part, then there was no curse involved and it is very possible that the normal gestation period before the fall would have been only seven months ("I will greatly increase they birth" - i.e. gestation).

So with that information we can make an educated guess as to what occured that fits all the facts together in a logical chain of events.

In 8 BC the Emperor orders a Census for property tax purposes and it takes about five years to complete during which at any time the person could travel to his respective home town to register. Joseph knows he has to got to Bethleham to register and he has to take Mary with him. Is he gonna wait until her ninth month to go - making pilgrammage for Passover - or is he, more likely, going to go in her seventh month when they can check out Jerusalem during Hannakkuh which the Rabbim will tell you was a spectacular event during the Festival of Lights. Of course they will head out when Mary is only seven months pregnant. However, either because the trip caused a forced labor, or because of a sinless conception and birth, Y'shua is born in the seventh month, just as they get to Bethleham which was packed with tourist, not coming to register, per sae, but to go up to the feast of Hannakkuh, which is also when the Foundation Stone was placed in the Temple.

Thus, Y'shua honored this Festival cause it was his birth day when the Light came into the world, which he claimed to be on that very holiday, and because he is also the Stone that the builders rejected.

And, so, Liturgy tomorrow at St. Mark's Coptic...

2010-05-19T16:21:59.212-06:00

And, so, Liturgy tomorrow at St. Mark's Coptic Church - first one since the service at the Ethiopian Church mentioned above and, interestingly enough, the Moon is gonna be moving into Leo.

That's the Riddle of the Honey from the Lion...

Of course, a Lion comes out at Night...

2010-05-18T14:13:55.640-06:00

Of course, a Lion comes out at Night...

Your first statement - that Y'shua and his fol...

2010-03-10T13:32:22.623-07:00

Your first statement - that Y'shua and his followers fulfilled the Torah is correct up until the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD however, you second statement, that these disciples and Christianity were in direct opposition ("antithetical") is absolutely incorrect for Peter was sent to the Gentiles by the Lord as was Paul subsequently by the Lord himself and he presented the Gentiles to the First Ecumenical Council in Jerusalem and James and all the Apostles laid out some ground rules for the Gentiles - that there were ingrafted into the Commonwealth of Israel but did not have to fulfill the Law outwardly because they fulfilled the Law inwardly by the power of the Holy Spirit as was predicted of the receipitants of the New Covenant.

Stephen was, obviously, a follower of the Law or he never would have gotten in an argument with the Freemen to begin with and it was not a matter of the Law that led to his stoning, simply he belief and teaching in the Resurrection of Y'shua and his diety.

Quote from the blog post: "o make up for his ...

2010-03-10T02:47:34.922-07:00

Quote from the blog post: "o make up for his part in Stephens death, "

I will comment about "Stephen", but first some valuable information.

A logical analysis (found in www.netzarim.co.il (that is the website of the only legitimate Netzarim-group)) of all extant source documents and archeology proves that the historical Ribi Yehosuha ha-Mashiakh (the Messiah) from Nazareth and his talmidim (apprentice-students), called the Netzarim, taught and lived Torah all of their lives; and that Netzarim and Christianity were always antithetical.

About Stephanos:

“All of the "ekklesia” (church – of Hellenists; not – beit ha-Kneset (house of assembly, Hellenized to sunagogae; anglicized to synagouge) of Netzarim) was scattered but the "εκκλησια"excluded (excepted) the selikhim (emissaries; Hellenized to apostolos) [who were Netzarim]! This should be obvious: Perushim (Pharisees) (which included Netzarim) didn’t flee from Perushim in Israel to the safety (?!?) of Hellenist Romans in a Roman city – Hellenist Jews fleeing the Perushim did that! Stephanos’ Hellenist faction is here distinguished from the Netzarim (the talmidim (apprentice-students) of Ribi Yehoshua). Stephanos’ Hellenist faction is persecuted while the Netzarim are not. This is a new sect; the Evyonim (anglicized to “Ebionites”).

Scattered? This is the flight of the Evyonim, not Netzairm, to Pella (see “30-99 C.E.”-section in the above website (History Museum)).”

One final comment on this subject is that the date...

2010-03-06T11:47:38.206-07:00

One final comment on this subject is that the date for judgment chosen was based on the Sacking of Samaria in 722 BC plus the 2730 years exile set out in Ezekiel's Seige. This date was then verified with a 2520 Year Rular which targetted the year 1776 AD as an important date in modern Ephraim's History which is, of course, the year America declared her independance from Britain.

Now, the possibility exists that, in fact, Samaria fell in 721 BC which is the actual date for the first year of Sargon as even Thiele acknowledges (he places the fall of Samaria in 723 BC). This, then would place the judgment of Ephraim/America in 2010 AD - between now and Tabernacles.

The Check date using the 2520 Year Rule would then land on 1777 AD and this is the year that we began to turn the revolution around for our benefit and, interestingly enough, there are two major dates in this year that both land precisely on two Jewish Holidays of importance - Tisha be Av and the Feast of Tabernacles.

The first date corresponds to the Battle of Bennington.

The battle was an important victory for the American cause, as it reduced Burgoyne's army in size by almost 1,000 men, led his Indian support to largely abandon him, and deprived him of needed supplies, all factors that contributed to Burgoyne's eventual surrender at Saratoga. The victory also galvanized colonial support for the independence movement, and played a role in bringing France into the war on the American side. The battle anniversary is celebrated in the state of Vermont as Bennington Battle Day. Wikipedia

And the second date corresponds to the Battle of Saratoga which is considered to be the turning point in the war.

The Battles of Saratoga, sometimes referred to as The Battle of Saratoga (September 19 and October 7, 1777) conclusively decided the fate of British General John Burgoyne's army in the American Revolutionary War, (known in the UK as the American War of Independence) and are generally regarded as a turning point in the war.

He again attacked the Americans in the October 7 Battle of Bemis Heights and the Americans captured a portion of the British defenses. Burgoyne was therefore compelled to retreat, and his army was surrounded by the much larger American force at Saratoga, forcing him to surrender on October 17.

News of Burgoyne's surrender was instrumental in formally bringing France into the war as an American ally, having previously given supplies, ammunition and guns, notably the de Valliere which played an important role in Saratoga.[8] French formal participation changed the war to a global conflict. Wikipedia

So, considering that the original seige of Samaria took three years (corresponding in our day to 2008, 09 and 10) and that two major Battles of the Revolutionary War occured in 1777 AD exactly on two major Jewish Holidays is pretty good indication that we are, in fact, dur for judgment this year and the information in the previous portion of this post is probably highly applicable in this year.

2010-03-06T11:46:32.198-07:00

This comment has been removed by the author.

hipeople this is a great forum hope im welcome :)

2010-02-11T17:02:58.095-07:00

hipeople this is a great forum hope im welcome :)

Hello, as you can see this is my first post here. ...

2010-02-09T04:24:12.975-07:00

Hello, as you can see this is my first post here.
In first steps it's really nice if somebody supports you, so hope to meet friendly and helpful people here. Let me know if I can help you.
Thanks and good luck everyone! ;)

Now, Thiele says Sargon ascended the throne Decemb...

2010-02-02T11:23:59.578-07:00

Now, Thiele says Sargon ascended the throne December 722 BC. We know he incorrectly assumes there was no coregency between the two which there actually was.

Thus, Samaria did in fact fall sometime around December 722 BC or shortly therefore being his ascenion year with the first year of his reign starting, basically, New Year 721 BC.

Isaiah's Flowering Vine places the start of the three year seige in the Spring and Amos Basket places the fall of Samaria three years later in the summer.

Thus, in theory, we have the fall of Samaria in the Summer of 722 BC.

Sargon ascended in December. Tere is so much conf...

2010-02-02T11:18:16.026-07:00

Sargon ascended in December.

Tere is so much confusion - whether Sargon actually sacked Samaria or just wiped it up after Shalmaneser kicked the bucket - then I suspect that it is possible that Samaria fell in December of either 723 or 722 BC.

With 723 BC then Hayim says that Sargon didn't have any compains in Israel in 722 or 721 but if he was claiming the work of his predecessor, then the fall might have occured in 722 AD.

This, however, disagrees with Thiel's conclusions.

If Thiele is correct, then Ephraim/America should already have been judged between 2008-09 which happens to agree with a date Rosh Kodesh picked and also with the my Timeline in the Pyramid based on Davidson's Work - triple veil of prophecy falling precisely in December 2008.

Here is Thiele's Book : http://books.google.c...

2010-02-02T11:11:44.958-07:00

Here is Thiele's Book :

http://books.google.com/books?id=Wx4GsZH3dzAC&pg=PA163&lpg=PA163&dq=samaria+assyria+sargon+ii+thiele&source=bl&ots=GMfetTzXLf&sig=Ml5GRFBCvn0CJBNyrNIS8ZweQnY&hl=en&ei=L2RoS5XkIIK0sgP8ncmZBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CCkQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=&f=false

Here is the relevant info : Thiele's chron...

2010-02-02T10:56:15.274-07:00
Here is the relevant info :

Thiele's chronology based on the Biblical texts was not compatible with Samaria falling to Sargon II in 722 BC or later, as held by most Assyriologists when Thiele first published his research. Thiele maintained, based on Scriptural texts, that Samaria must have fallen in 723, and therefore to Shalmaneser V rather than to Sargon II, despite the fact that Sargon II, at a later time in his reign, boasted of conquering Samaria. That Thiele was correct was demonstrated in 1958, when Hayim Tadmor showed, from Assyrian records, that Sargon had no campaigns in the west (i.e., toward Israel) in 722 or 721 BC.[9]

[9] ↑ Hayim Tadmor, "The campaigns of Sargon II of Assur: A Chronological-Historical Study," Journal of Cuneiform Studies 12, pp. 22-42.

From the Wiki Article : "Edwin R. Thie...

2010-02-02T10:46:58.721-07:00
From the Wiki Article :

"Edwin R. Thiele was a missionary, church periodical editor, educator, and Biblical chronologist. He is best known for his influential book on the chronology of the Hebrew kingdom period, The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings. Thiele's approach to chronology was based on his putting first priority on determining the historical methods and conventions of the ancient authors who gave us the texts of the Old Testament historical books. Coupled with this was his belief that these texts should be considered as primary and authentic historical records unless clear evidence pointed to the contrary. Thiele's resultant chronology has won a place in the scholarly world that has never been achieved by writers who regard the Scriptural historical texts as uninspired and prone to error."

Here is an article from Wiki on Thiele : http://c...

2010-02-02T10:45:25.359-07:00
Here is an article from Wiki on Thiele :

http://creationwiki.org/Edwin_Thiele

Here is a run down on the Assyrian Chronologies by...

2010-02-02T10:41:43.872-07:00
Here is a run down on the Assyrian Chronologies by a guy referencing Thiele, which is whom I used for my chronologies and whom I believe is correct.

http://jss.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pdf_extract/XXXIX/2/324

There is still some question in my mind concerning...

2010-02-02T10:35:21.567-07:00
There is still some question in my mind concerning the three deportations of Ephraim and the fall of Samaria has been tied to 722 AD which I had a write up on somewhere but can't find it now but the four dates in question would be 767, 745, 722 and 705 with this last date applying to Judah, not Ephraim.

Thus the 722 BC date for the fall of Samaria is what we are looking at now. The problem is that the seige was started by Shalmaneser V and continued for three years, during which time he was (probably) suicided and succeeded by Sargon II who finished the job. Some dates say 722 and some 721 with the seige starting in 723 BC. To further complicate matters, they reigned as co-regents for about one year.

This one year, then, would extend the judgement period up to that one year and thus the end times judgment of Ephraim (see my post The Night) could occur anytime in 2010 AD as well - up to Nisan First of 2011 AD.

Not so coincidentally, I just saw Avatar at the Sh...

2010-02-01T11:08:53.416-07:00
Not so coincidentally, I just saw Avatar at the Shelter this past weekend - today being Monday.

Theoferrum

wow the bible is right!

The Norway Spiral [video=http://www.youtube.com/wa...

Here is the info http://theoferrum.activeboard.c...

The Norway Spiral occured exactly two days after t...

Apparently, someone somewhere has a problem with s...

http://www.big-boards.com/

Hi Very nice and intrestingss story.

So, here is the deal. Elizebeth had already exper...

And, so, Liturgy tomorrow at St. Mark's Coptic...

Of course, a Lion comes out at Night...

Your first statement - that Y'shua and his fol...

Quote from the blog post: "o make up for his ...

One final comment on this subject is that the date...

hipeople this is a great forum hope im welcome :)

Hello, as you can see this is my first post here. ...

Now, Thiele says Sargon ascended the throne Decemb...

Sargon ascended in December. Tere is so much conf...

Here is Thiele's Book : http://books.google.c...

Here is the relevant info : Thiele's chron...

From the Wiki Article : "Edwin R. Thie...

Here is an article from Wiki on Thiele : http://c...

Here is a run down on the Assyrian Chronologies by...

There is still some question in my mind concerning...

Not so coincidentally, I just saw Avatar at the Sh...